Nashville’s tourism economy and entertainment economy are already deeply intertwined, but they often behave as though they belong to different systems.
Visitors come here because of music, performance, culture, storytelling, film, festivals, nightlife, food, neighborhoods, and the mythology surrounding the city’s entertainment industries. At the same time, productions, venues, festivals, artists, studios, and entertainment businesses are making decisions about locations, audiences, hospitality, scheduling, partnerships, and public engagement that directly affect the visitor experience.
The two economies are already connected in practice. What is missing is a more intentional structure for collaboration.
Entertainment creates far more visitor value than the immediate ticket sale or production spend. A film or television project can continue generating tourism years after the crew leaves. A festival can drive hotel stays, restaurant spending, neighborhood exploration, and repeat visitation well beyond the event itself. A studio, venue, music landmark, or filming location can become part of the city’s cultural geography, while an active production can sometimes create carefully managed public interest without compromising the work itself.
The opportunity is not to turn every production into a tourist attraction or every artist into a marketing campaign. It is to build better pathways so that, where appropriate and voluntarily agreed, entertainment activity can create additional economic and cultural value for Nashville.
The problem is less conflict than fragmentation
Tourism organizations, production companies, venues, festivals, hospitality businesses, cultural institutions, and government agencies are often solving adjacent problems without enough shared infrastructure.
A production may need hotel rooms, transportation, restaurants, private dining, meeting space, local experiences, and visitor-facing information for cast, crew, executives, or guests. The tourism sector already knows how to provide many of those things, but the relationships may have to be assembled from scratch.
A tourism organization may want to promote Nashville’s screen history, but it may not know which rights can be used, which productions are comfortable participating, or which locations are appropriate for visitor traffic.
A local business may want to participate when a major event or production comes to its neighborhood, but there may be no obvious entry point.
A museum may have an exhibition opportunity related to a locally filmed project, while a production company may have archival material, costumes, props, or talent relationships that could support it, yet the two sides may never meet.
These are not necessarily failures of interest. They are failures of connection. A mature entertainment city should not depend on everybody happening to know the right person.
Build partnership pathways before opportunities appear
The most useful starting point would be a set of standing partnership pathways connecting entertainment and tourism.
Rather than negotiating every relationship from zero, Nashville could develop a framework showing how productions, festivals, entertainment businesses, cultural institutions, hotels, restaurants, attractions, and tourism organizations can collaborate when an opportunity makes sense.
That framework could establish:
- who initiates conversations;
- which organizations serve as connectors;
- what kinds of partnerships are possible;
- what information can be shared;
- what rights and approvals are required;
- how businesses participate;
- how visitor-facing activations are evaluated;
- and how economic impact is measured.
The goal would not be to require collaboration.
It would be to make collaboration easier.
If a production wants no public engagement, that decision should be respected. If a festival wants to maintain a completely independent identity, it should. If a rights-holder is interested in visitor programming, however, Nashville should be able to move quickly rather than spending months figuring out who is allowed to talk to whom.
Build a legal-reviewed collaboration library
This is one of the places where a public entertainment office or partnership organization could provide real practical value.
Entertainment and tourism collaborations can touch licensing, trademarks, likeness, photography, publicity, location access, insurance, sponsorship, merchandising, archival materials, and intellectual property. That complexity can discourage organizations from pursuing otherwise useful partnerships.
A legal-reviewed public document library could reduce some of that friction.
It might include model memoranda of understanding, participation agreements, location-tour language, photography and filming guidance, approved-use frameworks, rights checklists, sponsorship templates, visitor-activation agreements, and community-participation guidance.
These materials would not replace individual legal advice, but they would give organizations a credible starting point and help everyone understand the questions that need to be answered. That can turn a vague idea into something executable.
“Filmed in Nashville” should become an ongoing visitor product
One of the clearest opportunities is to capture value from productions after they leave.
A film or television project may spend several weeks or months in Nashville, but its cultural impact can last for years. Audiences become attached to locations, neighborhoods, restaurants, buildings, landscapes, and music associated with the work. Other cities have built entire tourism products around those associations.
Nashville could do this more systematically.
A Filmed in Nashville program could create official or partner-developed location maps, neighborhood itineraries, walking or driving tours, retrospective screenings, anniversary programming, museum exhibitions, venue partnerships, and food or music experiences connected to productions made here.
The point would not be to manufacture artificial attractions. It would be to help visitors find the places they already want to see.
A visitor who loved a film shot in Nashville might want to visit a recognizable location, eat at a nearby restaurant, see the venue where a scene was filmed, and then attend a screening or live performance connected to the project. At the moment, those experiences are often fragmented across search results, fan sites, and informal recommendations. A coordinated visitor product could put them together.
The best version would benefit neighborhoods, not only downtown
This is particularly important for Nashville because screen tourism can distribute visitor spending geographically.
A filming-location itinerary does not have to send everyone to the same few tourist districts. It can lead visitors into neighborhoods, independent restaurants, local museums, historic sites, parks, small venues, bookstores, and other businesses connected to the project or its themes.
That creates a more interesting visitor experience while spreading economic benefit. It also gives neighborhoods a reason to see production as something that can create lasting value rather than simply temporary traffic, road closures, or inconvenience. If a production uses a neighborhood intensively for several days and leaves no visible benefit behind, residents may reasonably feel that the costs were theirs while the rewards went somewhere else. A thoughtful tourism strategy can help change that equation.
Film anniversaries are an underused economic-development tool
Entertainment properties have natural anniversaries. Ten years. Twenty-five years. Fifty years.
A major anniversary can become a reason to bring audiences, cast members, filmmakers, press, and fans back to Nashville.
Imagine a retrospective weekend built around a film made here, with a screening, filmmaker conversation, location tour, exhibition, music performance, restaurant partnerships, and neighborhood programming.
The intellectual property already has an audience. The city does not need to invent demand from nothing. It needs to give that audience a reason to travel.
This is the kind of opportunity that becomes easier when tourism and entertainment organizations already know how to work together.
“Now Filming in Nashville” requires a different approach
Active productions create another kind of opportunity, but this one requires considerably more caution. The default should always be protecting production operations, confidentiality, safety, locations, talent, and rights. That means Nashville should never assume that an active production can become a visitor attraction.
But some projects may want public engagement. When that is true, a voluntary Now Filming in Nashville framework could create carefully controlled ways for productions to participate.
That might include approved social-media communications, behind-the-scenes content released by the production, local-business partnerships, public screenings, crew or filmmaker conversations, visitor information related to publicly accessible locations, or other experiences specifically authorized by the rights-holder and production team.
The principle should be opt-in, not opt-out. The production controls what is shared. The city helps make the opportunity work.
Local businesses should have a clearer entry point
The benefit should not stop with large hospitality companies. When entertainment activity comes into a neighborhood, local businesses should have a practical way to participate when appropriate.
A production partnership system could help connect crews and visitors with local restaurants, coffee shops, transportation providers, laundries, gyms, childcare, florists, grocery stores, retailers, accommodations, and other businesses.
A festival partnership could similarly connect attendees with nearby independent businesses through maps, discounts, packages, or curated itineraries.
This should not become a pay-to-play endorsement scheme. It should be a transparent mechanism for helping entertainment spending circulate locally.
The same logic applies to vendors. If Nashville wants entertainment activity to generate durable economic value, more of the money should move through Nashville businesses rather than immediately leaving the market.
Entertainment visitor itineraries could connect industries that rarely collaborate
Nashville’s strongest visitor products may be the ones that cross traditional sector boundaries.
A visitor interested in film may also care about music.
Someone coming for a festival may want to understand the neighborhood surrounding it.
A television fan may want to visit a filming location, hear music associated with the show, eat somewhere connected to the production, and visit a museum that provides historical context.
That makes possible a much richer class of entertainment visitor itineraries.
A music-and-film itinerary could connect recording studios, screen locations, live venues, soundtrack history, and screenings.
A Black film and culture itinerary could connect the International Black Film Festival with historically significant neighborhoods, music, museums, restaurants, cultural organizations, and locally made screen work.
A screen-locations itinerary could move visitors through several parts of Nashville while also telling the history of production in the city.
A songwriting-and-storytelling itinerary could connect music venues, publishing history, film locations, museums, and live performances.
The value here is not simply bundling attractions. It is telling a coherent story about the city.
Hospitality should be treated as part of production infrastructure
There is another side of tourism collaboration that has less to do with visitors and more to do with the people making entertainment.
Productions bring temporary populations into a city - cast, crew, executives, artists, managers, press, distributors, investors, festival guests. These people need hotels, short-term housing, transportation, food, meeting rooms, rehearsal spaces, gyms, medical care, childcare, laundry, and dozens of other services.
A standing entertainment-hospitality partnership could make Nashville easier to work in while creating reliable business for the hospitality sector. Preferred-rate programs, crew lodging relationships, long-stay options, group transportation, dining partnerships, and local-service guides could all become part of the city's production infrastructure. The same system could serve touring productions, festivals, conferences, and large live events.
In that sense, tourism collaboration is not merely a visitor strategy. It is also an industry recruitment tool.
Joint planning matters because calendars collide
Nashville also hosts a remarkable number of festivals, concerts, conferences, sporting events, conventions, productions, and major tourism moments. Without coordination, these activities can compete for hotel rooms, venues, transportation, security personnel, crews, rental equipment, restaurants, and public space.
A large production arriving during an already overloaded week can face inflated costs and limited availability, while a festival may discover too late that another event has consumed much of the city's capacity.
Some of that competition is unavoidable, but shared planning can make it more manageable.
An entertainment office, tourism organization, convention bureau, major venues, festivals, and relevant Metro departments could maintain a forward-looking calendar of high-impact entertainment activity, not necessarily to control scheduling but to identify pressure points and opportunities.
Sometimes the overlap itself may create value. Two events may have compatible audiences.
A film festival may overlap with a music conference. A major artist release may create an opportunity for a screen event. A production may bring talent to town during an existing festival.
Joint planning allows Nashville to see those intersections before they disappear.
The public role should be connective, not commercial
As with many of these proposals, I do not think the city should become a tour operator, merchandising company, or entertainment rights broker.
The public role is to reduce friction.
- Map the opportunities.
- Convene partners.
- Create templates.
- Help organizations understand the rules.
- Make introductions.
- Coordinate where government is involved.
- Collect data.
Then let tourism businesses, cultural institutions, producers, festivals, venues, and rights-holders build the actual products.
That division preserves the strengths of each sector.
- Government provides infrastructure and coordination.
- Industry provides entertainment.
- Tourism professionals understand visitors.
- Local businesses provide experiences.
- Communities help define what responsible participation looks like.
Measure what happens after the visitor arrives
A serious entertainment-tourism strategy should also be measurable.
- How many visitors participated in a film-related experience?
- How long did they stay?
- Where did they spend money?
- Did they travel outside the central tourism districts?
- Did local businesses benefit?
- Did visitors attend multiple cultural experiences?
- Did an anniversary event drive hotel demand?
- Did a production-related visitor product create additional spending after the production itself had wrapped?
- Did a film festival visitor return to Nashville later for another reason?
Those answers help Nashville distinguish between ideas that merely sound interesting and programs that actually create economic value.
The larger opportunity
Nashville already has one of the country's most powerful examples of entertainment-driven tourism. People do not come here only because there are hotel rooms, restaurants, and attractions. They come because culture is being made here.
The next step is to become more intentional about the relationship between the culture being made and the visitor economy surrounding it.
A film should not stop creating value for Nashville on the final day of production.
A festival should not begin and end at the theatre doors.
A recording studio should not exist entirely outside the visitor story of Music City.
A neighborhood that hosts entertainment activity should have opportunities to participate in the value that activity creates.
And when entertainment businesses, tourism organizations, hospitality companies, cultural institutions, communities, and government want to work together, they should not have to invent the relationship from scratch.
The goal is not to commercialize every cultural experience or turn Nashville into a permanent promotional activation. It is much simpler than that.
Entertainment creates reasons to visit. Tourism creates ways for people to experience the places where entertainment happens. Nashville should build the infrastructure that allows those two systems to reinforce one another.
0 comments